Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 144436

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : OC53 - OC56 Full Version

Importance of Positive T-wave in Lead aVR and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Cohort Study


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65306.18970
Sharan Badiger, Shruti Hiremath

1. Professor and Head, Department of Medicine, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Shri B.M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India. 2. Consultant, Department of Medicine, Nano Hospitals, Hulimavu, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sharan Badiger,
Professor and Head, Department of Medicine, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Shri B.M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura-586103, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: sharanrb@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: It is well known that ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is a significant contributor to both illness and death on a global scale. An Electrocardiogram (ECG) is an easily accessible bedside tool for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction. The T wave is usually negative in lead aVR (augmented unipolar right arm lead). However, a positive T wave in lead aVR has been shown to be associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).

Aim: To examine whether a positive T wave in lead aVR can be used as an indicator to predict Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) during the hospital stay in patients with STEMI.

Materials and Methods: A cohort study was performed at Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, involving patients admitted with STEMI. A total of 98 newly diagnosed ST-segment elevation patients were classified into two groups: Group A (positive T wave) in lead aVR with an amplitude of ≥ 0 mV, and Group B (negative T wave) in lead aVR with an amplitude of ≤0 mV. The hospital stays of STEMI patients were evaluated for adverse cardiac events. Chi-square test was used to assess relationships between categorical variables.

Results: A total of 98 patients were evaluated, among which two were excluded. Hence, among 96 patients considered, 25 were females and 71 were male, with average ages of 57 years in Group A and 55 years in Group B. Among the 96 patients, 34 had positive T waves (35.4%) and 62 had negative T waves (64.5%) in lead aVR. The study revealed significantly higher rates of in-hospital MACE (heart failure, pulmonary oedema, and arrhythmias) in patients with positive T waves (Group A) in lead aVR, with p-values <0.05, which were statistically significant.

Conclusion: The present study showed that a positive T wave in lead aVR is a valuable and cost-effective tool for predicting in-hospital MACE in patients with STEMI. Utilising this simple and readily available ECG measurement could support clinicians in detecting high-risk patients who require closer monitoring and more aggressive interventions, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes and resource allocation.

Keywords

Cardiovascular diseases, Electrocardiography, Myocardial ischaemia

The high mortality rate associated with ACS highlighted the critical need for early detection. Only 22% of individuals presenting with chest discomfort at emergency cardiology clinics are diagnosed with coronary artery disease (1). ACS imposes a significant economic burden globally and is a significant cause of disability and mortality. The disease is influenced by various risk factors, and its prevalence is rising in India (2). Geographically, racially, culturally, educationally, institutionally, and economically, India is a greatly diverse country. The second largest population on Earth resides in India. These factors further increase the difficulty in managing ACS. World Health Organisation (WHO) reports show that the incidence of ACS is increasing in India, pointing to a dramatic shift in the country’s epidemiology (3). There are about three million reported STEMI cases annually in India, making ACS the main cause of mortality there (4).

ACS encompasses conditions such as Unstable Angina (UA), STEMI, and non STEMI (NSTEMI), all of which manifest as acute chest pain due to myocardial ischaemia. While the pathophysiology may differ, these conditions share an underlying imbalance between oxygen supply and demand (5). ACS is affected by different risk factors, including non modifiable factors like family history, ethnicity, sex, age, genetic predisposition, as well as, modifiable factors like diabetes, hypertension, obesity, smoking/tobacco use, and diet (6). It is crucial to effectively predict and manage significant adverse cardiac events, such as heart failure, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary oedema, arrhythmias, and re-infarction, in high-risk patients (7).

Electrocardiography, introduced in 1902 by the Dutch physician William Einthoven, 15. He provided information about the electrophysiology of the heart (8). Electrocardiography is now considered an important and common aspect of the initial assessment of patients with cardiac symptoms. It is a non invasive, low-cost, and easily accessible technique for assessing ACS (9). Lead aVR, one of the twelve leads on the ECG, has long been overlooked, but new research has shown that it can help with both the diagnosis and prognosis of various myocardial illnesses (10),(11).

The T wave in lead aVR is usually negative and typically moves in the same direction as the QRS complex (12). However, recent studies have demonstrated a significant relationship between a positive T wave in lead aVR and major adverse cardiac outcomes, such as heart failure, pulmonary oedema, persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac mortality resulting from STEMI (13),(14),(15). With this scenario, the present study aimed To examine whether a positive T wave in lead aVR can be used as an indicator to predict MACE during the hospital stay in patients with STEMI.

Material and Methods

The present cohort study was conducted on patients who were admitted with STEMI at Shri BM Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, from November 2019 to June 2021.

The sample size was calculated using the following formula:

n=z2p.(1-p)/d2

Here:
Z indicates the z statistic at a 5 percent level of significance,
d denotes the error margin,
p signifies the anticipated prevalence rate (50%),
n=100.

The Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) provided prior approval for this study (IEC/No-131/2019).

Inclusion criteria: Patients with prolonged chest discomfort and other angina equivalents typical of myocardial ischaemia, admitted to the Intensive Coronary Care Unit (ICCU) with a diagnosis of STEMI, were included.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with NSTEMI, left bundle branch block, and those with previous history of myocardial infarction were excluded from the study.

A total of 98 patients were evaluated based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were divided into two distinct groups based on the presence of a positive T wave (Group A) and a negative T wave (Group B) in lead aVR. The study collected patients’ clinical history, including age, gender, previous medical conditions, cardiovascular risk factors, and symptoms, while conducting thorough physical examinations to assess vital signs, cardiac sounds, and other relevant findings. Laboratory investigations included assessing cardiac biomarkers {troponin levels, Creatinine Kinase (CK), CK-MB}, as well as lipid profile, renal function, and other parameters relevant to myocardial infarction.

A 2D echocardiogram was performed to evaluate left ventricular dysfunction and contractility. An ECG at the time of admission was conducted to diagnose STEMI and identify a positive T wave in lead aVR. A chest X-ray was taken to observe features of pulmonary oedema. Patients were Followed-up during their in-hospital stay to monitor MACE, such as heart failure, pulmonary oedema, arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, and death.

Statistical Analysis

A descriptive summary was provided for all the characteristics. Continuous variables were described using summary statistics in the form of mean±SD. Percentages and numbers were used for categorical data. To compare haemodynamic and laboratory data independent ‘t’ test was used. The Chi-square test was applied to examine the relationship between two categorical variables. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. Microsoft Excel version 7 (Microsoft Corporation, NY, USA) and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0 were used for all statistical calculations.

Results

In the present study, 98 patients had STEMI, of whom two were excluded based on the exclusion criteria. One patient had a prior history of Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD), and the other patient had a Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB). Hence, 96 patients were included in the present analysis and were divided into Group A and Group B based on lead aVR findings. Out of the 96 patients, 34 patients (35.4%) had Group A, and 62 patients (64.5%) had Group B in lead aVR on the ECGs.

(Table/Fig 1) provides an overview of the demographic and clinical features. Patients in Group A were older than those in Group B.

The findings of the electrocardiograph are presented in (Table/Fig 2). STEMI in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) was more frequent in patients with positive T waves in lead aVR.

The results of the distribution of MACE are shown in (Table/Fig 3). The results indicate that, compared to patients with negative T waves in lead aVR, patients with positive T waves were more likely to experience MACE, such as heart failure, pulmonary oedema, and arrhythmias (p≤0.05).

Discussion

The study findings revealed that Group A in lead aVR was a predictor of major adverse events in patients with STEMI. Group A in lead aVR was associated with occlusive disease of the long Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with previous anterior wall myocardial infarction. According to Shinozaki K et al., (16), blocking the long LAD artery, which supplies the inferior, apical, and lower lateral portions of the left ventricle, can lead to extensive myocardial ischaemia and significant left ventricular dysfunction.

In a study by Torigoe K et al., (17), it was found that individuals with a positive T wave in lead aVR were more likely to have multivessel disease, especially in patients with a history of myocardial infarction. Ayhan E (18) also reported that patients with anterior wall STEMI and positive T waves in lead aVR had a higher incidence of proximal LAD occlusion and multivessel disease. This suggested that the presence of positive T waves may indicate extensive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), resulting in widespread myocardial ischaemia and negative clinical outcomes.

Although, the exact cause of Group A in lead aVR is still unknown, it has been suggested that concurrent myocardial ischaemia in the inferior, apical, and lower lateral walls leads to delayed repolarisation and the inversion of the T-wave vector towards the injured areas. This results in a positive T wave in lead aVR (16),(18).

In the present study, 96 patients were included and analysed to predict in-hospital MACE such as heart failure, pulmonary oedema, cardiogenic shock, arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation), and death. The most common age group observed was 51-60 years, which aligns with the findings of Ayhan E (18) who studied 169 patients and reported a similar age group with a mean age of 58%.

Kobayashi A et al., (10) conducted a study on 190 patients hospitalised with ACS and found that the predominant age group was 60-70 years. Additionally, Ajay VS and Prabhakaran D’s study indicated a shift in the mean age group since the early 70s. They found that ACS occured a decade earlier in the Indian population compared to Western countries (19). This difference may be attributed to factors such as lack of education about the disease, risk factors, evidence-based treatment, and non compliance with medications.

In this study, a male predominance was observed, with 71 male patients (73.9%) and 25 female patients (26.1%), which is consistent with the analysis conducted by Shinozaki K et al., (16), where 96 male patients and 26 female patients were included. However, Aygul N (20) reported a significantly higher proportion of male patients (742) compared to female patients (208) in their study.

The study identified smoking (p-value=0.03) as a significant modifiable risk factor for STEMI among the research subjects. Smoking and positive T waves in lead aVR showed a strong association. The most common symptoms observed among study subjects with STEMI were chest pain, dyspnoea, and syncope. Various studies have shown significant variations in the association of different risk factors with ACS. Ayhan E reported that among 169 patients with ACS, diabetes mellitus was present in 16.9% (n=53), smoking in 60.3% (n=53), and hypertension in 50.9% (n=53) (18).

The study had a higher incidence of risk factors such as alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and smoking for ACS compared to the present study. The study results are consistent with the analysis conducted by Krishnan MN on 5167 patients with ACS, where diabetes mellitus was present in 15% (n=775) of patients, hypertension in 28% (n=1446) of patients, and smoking in 28% (n=1446) of patients (21). Similarly, an analysis by Rao V et al., on 100 patients with ACS found that diabetes was present in 67% of patients, hypertension in 52% of patients, smoking in 61% of patients, and alcohol consumption in 21% of patients (22). An analysis reported by Unal B et al., concluded that a modest reduction in major risk factors like smoking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus can significantly increase the life expectancy of patients with ACS (23). Therefore, implementing policies to control tobacco use, promote a healthy diet, and educating patients about diabetes control is essential for improving the life expectancy of patients with ACS.

In this study, the most common symptom was chest pain (85.2% vs. 88.7%), followed by dyspnoea (73.5% vs. 61.2%), syncope (41.1% vs. 17.7%), palpitations (26.4% vs. 12.9%), and abdominal pain (11.7% vs. 12.9%) in both Group A and Group B. Similarly, an analysis by Goel PK on 609 patients admitted with AC found that the most frequent symptom was chest pain (n=510, 84%), followed by dyspnoea (n=53, 8.7%), and epigastric pain (n=16, 2.6%) (24). A study by Canto JG reported that chest pain was present in 67% of patients, which is lower than what was observed in our study (25).

In this study, hemodynamic and laboratory data revealed a significant correlation between serum creatinine and STEMI. An analysis by Reddy CT et al., reported that ECG identification of the culprit artery not only helps localise the occlusion but also predicts the severity of myocardial infarction and guides emergency management (26). Positive T waves in lead aVR were present in 34 patients with ST-segment elevation, accounting for 35.4% of the total patients in the current study.

In the present study, patients in Group A experienced more MACE, which is consistent with the findings of Ayhan E indicating that a positive T wave in lead aVR is associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing MACE during hospitalisation (18). Okuda K’s analysis also showed that a decrease in the negativity of the T wave amplitude in lead aVR was associated with an increased risk of death in patients diagnosed with heart failure (27). The latest work by Kazemi B et al., confirmed a significant association between Group A in lead aVR and an elevated risk of adverse clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, length of stay, cardiovascular mortality and rehospitalisation, within a six-month period in patients diagnosed with STEMI (11).

Limitation(s)

While the study investigating the correlation between a Group A in lead aVR and MACE in patients with STEMI offers valuable insights, it is essential to acknowledge its limitations. One notable limitation is that it was conducted at a single centre, potentially limiting its generalisability to diverse patient populations and varying healthcare practices seen in different settings. Additionally, due to its cohort design, the analysis might not have accounted for the long-term outcomes of the patients. Also, the caculated sample size of the study was not met. A longer follow-up duration with a larger sample size would be beneficial to gain a complete comprehension of the relation between Group A in lead aVR and MACE. Furthermore, the study solely assessed the initial ECG presented by patients upon admission, overlooking the potential influence of revascularisation procedures on the incidence of a positive T wave. Despite these limitations, the study’s findings provide a foundation for further research and validation studies to establish the clinical significance of using a positive T wave in lead aVR as a predictive tool for MACE in STEMI patients.

Conclusion

The importance of a positive T wave in lead aVR in cardiology is greater than currently recognised. There is an elevated risk of in-hospital major adverse cardiac outcomes, such as heart failure, pulmonary oedema, cardiogenic shock, and mortality, in patients with a positive T wave in lead aVR on the ECG among study subjects diagnosed with STEMI. Therefore, the positive T wave in lead aVR can be used to predict in-hospital MACE in STEMI-diagnosed patients.

References

1.
Chawla R, Goyal N, Calton R, Goyal S. Ischemia modified albumin: A novel marker for acute coronary syndrome. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2006;21(1):77-82. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Xavier D, Pais P, Devereaux PJ, Xie C, Prabhakaran D, Reddy KS, et al. Treatment and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in India (CREATE): A prospective analysis of registry data. Lancet. 2008;371(9622):1435-42. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A. Cardiovascular diseases in India: Current epidemiology and future directions. Circulation. 2016;133(16):1605-20. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Guha S, Sethi R, Ray S, Bahl VK, Shanmugasundaram S, Kerkar P, et al. Cardiological Society of India: Position statement for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction in India. Indian Heart J. 2017;69(Suppl 1):S63-S97. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/ American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;138(20):e618-e651. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Goff Jr DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB, Gibbons R, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Poudel I, Tejpal C, Rashid H, Jahan N. Major adverse cardiovascular events: An inevitable outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction? A literature review. Cureus. 2019;11(7):e5280. [crossref]
8.
Barold SS. Willem Einthoven and the birth of clinical electrocardiography a hundred years ago. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003;7(1):99-104. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Fye WB. A history of the origin, evolution, and impact of electrocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73(13):937-49. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Kobayashi A, Misumida N, Aoi S, Kanei Y. Positive T wave in lead a VR as an independent predictor for 1-year major adverse cardiac events in patients with first anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017;22(6):e12442. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Kazemi B, Sadat-Ebrahimi SR, Ranjbar A, Akbarzadeh F, Sadaie MR, Safaei N, et al. Clinical utility of aVR lead T-wave in electrocardiogram of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):520. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Matsukane A, Hayashi T, Tanaka Y, Iwasaki M, Kubo S, Asakawa T, et al. Usefulness of an upright T-wave in lead aVR for predicting the short-term prognosis of incident hemodialysis patients: A potential tool for screening high-risk hemodialysis patients. Cardiorenal Med. 2015;5(4):267-77. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kireyev D, Arkhipov MV, Zador ST, Paris JA, Boden WE. Clinical utility of aVR-the neglected electrocardiographic lead. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010;15(2):175-80. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kotoku M, Tamura A, Abe Y, Kadota J. Determinants of ST segment level in lead aVR in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation. J Electrocardiol. 2009;42(2):112-17. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Wong CK, Gao W, Stewart RA, French JK, Aylward PE, White HD, et al. The prognostic meaning of the full spectrum of aVR ST segment changes in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(3):384-92. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Shinozaki K, Tamura A, Kadota J. Associations of positive T wave in lead aVR with hemodynamic, coronary, and left ventricular angiographic findings in anterior wall old myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2011;57(2):160-64. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Torigoe K, Tamura A, Kawano Y, Shinozaki K, Kotoku M, Kadota J. Upright T waves in lead aVR are associated with cardiac death or hospitalisation for heart failure in patients with a prior myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels. 2012;27(6):548-52. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Ayhan E, Isik T, Uyarel H, Ergelen M, Cicek G, Ghannadian B, et al. Prognostic significance of T-wave amplitude in lead aVR on the admission electrocardiography in patients with anterior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous intervention. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2013;18(1):51-57. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Ajay VS, Prabhakaran D. Coronary heart disease in Indians: Implications of the INTERHEART study. Indian J Med Res. 2010;132(5):561-66.
20.
Aygul N, Ozdemir K, Tokac M, Aygul MU, Duzenli MA, Abaci A, et al. Value of lead aVR in predicting acute occlusion of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery and in-hospital outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An electrocardiographic predictor of poor prognosis. J Electrocardiol. 2008;41(4):335-41. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Krishnan MN, Zachariah G, Venugopal K, Mohanan PP, Harikrishnan S, Sanjay G, et al. Prevalence of coronary artery disease and its risk factors in Kerala, South India: A community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16(1):01-02. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Rao V, Rao P, Carvalho N. Risk factors for acute myocardial infarction in coastal region of India: A case-control study. Heart India. 2014;2(3):70. [crossref]
23.
Unal B, Critchley JA, Fidan D, Capewell S. Life-years gained from modern cardiological treatments and population risk factor changes in England and Wales, 1981-2000. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(1):103-08. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Goel PK, Srivastava SK, Ashfaq F, Gupta PR, Saxena PC, Agarwal R, et al. A study of clinical presentation and delays in management of acute myocardial infarction in community. Indian Heart J. 2012;64(3):295-301. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Canto JG, Shlipak MG, Rogers WJ, Malmgren JA, Frederick PD, Lambrew CT, et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. JAMA. 2000;283(24):3223-29. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Reddy CT, Rajasekhar D, Vanajakshamma V. Electrocardiographic localisation of infarct related coronary artery in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Clin Sci Res. 2013;2(3):151-60. [crossref]
27.
Okuda K, Watanabe E, Sano K, Arakawa T, Yamamoto M, Sobue Y, et al. Prognostic significance of T wave amplitude in lead aVR in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complexes. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2011;16(3):250-57.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65306.18970

Date of Submission: May 08, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jun 27, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 31, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 12, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 12, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 24, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com